Up to ~93% lower than the standard cloud STT tier at the matched workload — across Auricus Voice 8 / 16 / 32.
Each row matches a realistic annual audio volume to an Auricus Voice configuration; percentages compare against each cloud provider’s listed tier at that same volume.
| Accelerators | Matched annual audio (M min/yr) | AWS Transcribe (std) | Azure STT (real-time) | Azure STT (batch) | GCP STT v2 (std) | GCP STT v2 (dynamic batch) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | 2 | ~82% | ~74% | ~29% | ~73% | — |
| 16 | 4 | ~90% | ~86% | ~62% | ~86% | ~24% |
| 32 | 8 | ~93% | ~92% | ~79% | ~91% | ~57% |
Rounded figures derived from 2026-04 public list references (AWS Transcribe Std tiered, Azure STT real-time and batch, GCP STT v2 Std and Dynamic Batch). On-prem comparison assumes Auricus Voice with 4-year straight-line amortisation of capital hardware (illustrative TCO model), plus typical operating costs (power and support). An em-dash (—) means the matched on-prem TCO does not improve on that cloud tier at the lowest workload row — typically the very cheapest asynchronous batch tiers — and the appliance becomes advantageous from the next density up. Validate against your own quotes, volume discounts, and sustained utilisation.
The matched-workload savings above only count the API line item. The operational economics often matter more:
→ See the full compliance posture in Compliance, and the platform deep-dive in Platform.
Bring your annual audio volume, language mix, and SLO requirements and we’ll size a sovereign voice AI configuration against your current cloud spend.